Archive | December, 2008

Learning the Language

Thumbnail image for bakugan.jpgI haven’t posted in a while, mostly because of the holidays, but also because I’ve been trying to learn a new language. Liam has found a new obsession, one that has (temporarily?) supplanted Pokemon and even Star Wars: Bakugan. Bakugan apparently started on the Cartoon Network and is aimed (like so much of television and the movies – Adam Sandler, anyone?) at ten year old boys, which to Liam is the age of ultimate sophistication. 

The Bakugan TV show exists, as near as I can tell, as a platform to sell toys, video games, trading cards, and web applications. The genius of the story rests in its complexity, the endless lists of minutiae that governs each and every character. Here is what I learned the other morning when I walked Liam to school: there is a Bakugan who has 700Gs, which is the most Gs but you can get more Gs if you use a Masquerade card and then you get 800Gs but then in a battle with Mantris you can actually increase to 1000Gs and that’s the most you can ever get so you can win.

Actually, what Liam said was way more complicated than that, but as is the case when a middleish-aged person starts to learn a new language, I only caught about every other word.

Here are some tips from the Bakugan Strategy Corner that may help you see what a steep learning curve I’ve got ahead of me:

  • There’s no point in using Blaze, which only gives bonuses to Pyros, Aquos, and Ventos Bakugan if all your Bakugan are Haos!
    and
  • The card Earth, Wind, and Fire combos nicely with Forest Fire. You let your opponent win that first battle, then on this battle, you’ll get a bonus from the Gate Card along with an extra 100 G-Power as your opponent will have more Gate Cards, and ANOTHER extra 50-G because of Forest Fire!

Now, I know that Earth, Wind, and Fire can make a person’s bootie shake like a house a-fire, but I don’t think that’s what’s being described here. What is being described? Um…It’s got something to do with rolling these little plastic balls onto cards that are magnetized and then the balls spring open into little figures while the players shout “bakugan brawl!” After the brawl, there is usually much shouting about rules and what is or is not fair. Then this process is repeated. And repeated.

All this rule-bound minutiae is obviously just training for what is to come: sports trivia (number of RBIs in a season, pitches thrown by left-handers in a playoff game, bases stolen by right-hand Dominican players with ponytails, etc). Or maybe sports trivia is simply compensation for lost youth: no grown man wants to be seen carrying around Bakugan balls or a Pokeman deck. But clearly the rules and details of these childhood games set up a template that will exclude the female equivalent: the minutiae of relationships: “I told you, they split up and now he’s dating her ex-roommate and she hooked up with an old friend but didn’t know that he’d also dated the ex-roommate and now she’s furious at the roommate but the roommate doesn’t think she’s done anything wrong…”

It will come as no suprise at this point if I tell you that I’m not a fan of the games that Liam loves, just as I’m not a fan of sports trivia. I think it’s all…dull. There. I said it. Boring, maybe even bordering on pointless. I don’t get it. And I don’t particularly want to get it. Yes, I cheer for the Mets (a pre-condition for marriage) and we go to the occasional baseball game, and I even usually learn the starting line-up (by the end of the summer). But that’s about it.

As parents, of course, we all spend time doing things we don’t want to do, and pretending we’re interested when we’re not (ever made a grocery list or compose an email while reading a bedtime story for the eight gazillionth time?). No one ever warns you about the boredom that accompanies so much of being a parent. It’s not in any of the parenting books.

But Liam’s love affair with Bakugan seems different, somehow, because now he’s eight and seems more and more like … like a boy, and not a child. His silly game gets wound up in my questions and fears about being the mother of a boy: how will I find common ground with him, as he grows up?

A few years ago, I saw a mother on the beach with her two sons, who looked to be in early adolescence. The three of them were playing lacrosse together – the boys clearly better than their mother – and they seemed to be having a good time. But watching them, I wondered if that mother would really rather be taking a long walk, or sitting in her lounge chair reading trashy novels, instead of dashing around on the sand shouting “good pass!”

Each time I found out that I was pregnant with a boy, I was amazed. It is a strange thing, if you think about it: I mean, tomatoes don’t suddenly sprout, you know, beans or onions or some other non-tomato vegetable. But women give birth to…men. For clarity’s sake, men should give birth to boys and women to girls; it’s really the only logical system. Instead, I’ve given birth to this creature who shared everything with me for the first years of his life and now he walks by a table and flips the magazines on the floor, and when I ask him why, he just stares at me and shrugs.

The mother of boys. Sometimes I think I should start a support group for women without daughters – we can all call each other and chat, when we’re in our late sixties, and ask one another all the questions that sons never do. My mother, by way of consolation, insists that boys treat their mothers like queens and while that may be true, that’s not the type of relationship I’m looking for (unless the rest of the world would like to chime in and agree to crown me empress of the planet, in which case maybe we can work something out). 

Liam is, actually, not a very typical eight-year-old-boy – he cheerfully spent an hour tonight after dinner making a beaded necklace for himself, carefully selecting various shapes of pink beads. (And, yes, I realize that “normal” is a loaded word, but still, you know what I mean). But even so, he has that need to hurl self and others through space, and the inability to sit at the dinner table without tapping, chirping, drumming, whistling, gurgling…and, of course, the insatiable desire for tiny factoids that he can fit together into intricate schema that will become the winning strategy for The Game.

And his love for The Game makes me wonder: do I have to learn the language of Bakugan to stay close to my son?

Read full story · Comments { 2 } on December 28, 2008 in Gender, Kids

Snowy Suburbs – and a little zen – on the 15th Floor

childehassam.jpgIt’s snowing today in New York and as always that first snow turns the city into an Impressionist canvas: the hard edges are softened, noises are muffled. It’s lovely. (Eventually, of course, sometime in late January, the romance of “first snow” will be gone and we’ll be left with piles of filthy slush, but we won’t think about that today. Yes, there’s probably a relationship metaphor in here somewhere).

And snow, of course, causes delirium, veritable paroxysms of joy, in the small fry. Caleb doesn’t go to nursery school on Fridays, so I bundled him up in all kinds of weather-appropriate gear (thus creating the particular kind of waddling run that can be achieved only by combining snowpants that are slightly too big with snowboots that don’t quite fit) and went out on the terrace of our building. By virtue of being on the fifteenth floor, the terrace offers a wonderful snow-day opportunity: the snow is relatively clean – and thus edible, as long as I don’t think too hard about the filthy air through which the snow falls – and because no one else goes out there, the kids have the joy of being the first to mark that smooth white surface.

terracesnow.jpgToday’s snowfall was particularly delicious for Caleb because he didn’t have to share the snow with his older brother, who, truth be told, has a penchant for “accidently” pushing his brother face-first into a snow pile.

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about city living versus suburban living – in part because of the low-grade stress over where Caleb will go to kindergarten, but also because of all those Things That People Say: more outside space, slower pace, more closets, owning versus renting, mini-vans versus strollers. And while I know that moving “out there” isn’t a magic bullet for anything, and that my friends who live in various NYC ‘burbs don’t think they’re living in PerfectLand, still…I wonder.

A guy named Leo Marx wrote a book in the late 1960s called The Machine in the Garden, which is about the constant tension in US culture between the technology of the cities and the pastoralism of the country as illustrated in the work of a number of early 20th century novelists, particularly Hemingway and Fitzgerald. Marx doesn’t talk about kids, of course – his book is “serious” – but the tension he describes still exists, only now it also gets played out in the ongoing parental debates about the best place to raise children. Marx talks about literary characters being able to drive back and forth from city to country, or doing like Nick Carraway does, in The Great Gatsby – figuring out how to “rusticate” in the country on the weekends while working in the city (without having a big salary).  

For those of us without ready access to a country house, however, “rusticating” is a more illusory condition. We need to find our country house (or suburban yard) wherever we can find it – perhaps a terrace on a snowy day (although in the time it has taken me to write this, the snow has changed to freezing rain, about which it is almost impossible to wax poetic – and thus we see the fleeting nature of first love snow). Judging from the grin on Caleb’s face as he tromped around, however, he doesn’t care where the snow falls – city, suburb, country – as long as he can be out in it.

caleb_sled.jpg

calebcarsnow.jpgI guess my lesson for this snowy day is that I should be equally zen, right? Less angst and worry, more “be here now,” as Ram Dass would say. Even if “here and now” is face down inside a snowy police car, high on the 15th floor.

Non-zen postscript, unrelated to snow: I’m now also contributing to the NYC Moms Blog (and shamelessly used this post to link to my first post for that site): Follow this link, or click on the NYC Moms Blog button on this page.

Read full story · Comments { 3 } on December 19, 2008 in Children, NYC

Recession? What Recession?

sabathia.jpgI’d been planning to write a post about Liam wanting zinnia-flowered pajamas, but that’s going to have to wait until I’m done ranting about the Yankees.

The Yankees announced today that CC Sabathia, a 6′ 7″pitcher, accepted their offer of $161 million dollars for seven years. That’s $23 milliion per year, or, to think even more concretely, it’s about 300,000 dollars per inch. He’s a big guy.

The new Yankee stadium, the one with more than forty-five luxury suites, may cost the NYC taxpayers upwards of $450 MILLION dollars. That’s a big number, so let me put it in context:  those of us who live in the city – many of whom, believe it or not, could give the proverbial rat’s ass about baseball – will be forking over $450 million dollars for this new fancy-shmancy stadium; CC Sabathia will be getting 23 million of that 450, and my son’s public elementary school just had $50,000 chopped from its budget.

Hmm. 

Oh, and let’s not forget the MLB tax shelters, designed for teams that are financing new stadiums: this tax shelter allows teams to hide revenue that would otherwise be taxed at 31%. (For more about the Yankee business model, follow this link).

Am I being unsophisticated in my rage at the thought that a sports team thinks it justifiable to wave such gargantuan sums of money around at a time when people’s lives are imploding, when schools are being closed or are so crowded they’re holding classes in hallways and trailers, when the jobless rate is at a fifteen-year high (533,000 jobs lost in November alone)?

A 2001 study done about the cost of constructing new public schools estimated that a new school could cost as little as $8,483,937…should we think about how many schools could be built – or renovated – with just one year of CC’s salary?

Wait – let’s not penalize the big guy; it’s not his fault that the Yankees have waved this mammoth paycheck under his nose. Hell, if they offered it to me, I’d take it too. Let’s think about what we could do as a city with $450 million dollars; or with the $70 million tax-exempt subsidies the Yankees were given for building parking garages; or even with the paltry $850,000 that one of the new luxury suites will cost.

Seems to me that “Governor” (using the term very loosely) Blagojevich, for all his disgusting crassness and possible insanity, simply did in the open what usually gets done covertly, under the capacious umbrella of ‘”good for business.” The Yankees threatened to leave town if the city (led at the time by that paragon, Rudy Giuliani) didn’t meet the team’s extortionate demands – and the city caved. Isn’t that quite literally “pay to play,” which is a lot like saying “pay me for a Senate seat”?

Oh sure, I know, the Yankees contribute to the tax base and it’s good for morale and there’s, you know, all that tradition and honor and sportsmanship – to which I say faugh! Seems to me there would be more honor in offering money to build new schools, not new parking garages; or in figuring out how to bring more jobs (not as hot-dog vendors and beer pourers, thanks) to the Bronx; seems to me that the only tradition that the Yankees are upholding at the moment is that grand American tradition of screwing everyone else in pursuit of The Big Win.

Hope CC puts his money under the mattress and not in a 401(k).

 

Read full story · Comments { 0 } on December 11, 2008 in NYC