Will no one rid me of these wretched districts?

Once upon a time, there was a king who wanted to have more freedom than the church would allow. In fact, a certain clergy man had become quite powerful in his own right and was challenging the king’s authority, but the king could not, outright, do anything.  At one point, exasperated beyond control, the king is thought to have said “will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest” and within a week or so, four of his knights had ridden to Canterbury and killed the meddlesome priest, right in the nave of the cathedral.

Thomas Becket became a martyr, which wasn’t quite what Henry II had planned; in fact, Henry had to do significant penance for the murder—a murder in which he took no direct part.

I doubt that Sarah Palin knows the story of Thomas Becket, or Henry II, or has read much Shakespeare. But what she and her minions—her versions of Henry’s over zealous knights—should perhaps realize is that rhetoric matters.  Sarah doesn’t seem to have much respect for language (“refudiate,” anyone?) or for “book learning,” so maybe she and her peeps had no concern about the ripple effect of putting targets over various congressional districts, on her now infamous “take back the 20” map.  Perhaps the language on her website isn’t meant to inflame, despite using words like “fire,” and “take aim” and “hold them accountable;” or her assertion that the mid-term elections are just the “first salvo in a fight.”

In fact, I hope she is that ignorant, that she is genuinely shocked shocked that anyone would take her language as a license to hunt down and kill public representatives. I hope she’s that ignorant because if she’s not, there is no limit to the depth of her cynicism and malice.

And maybe it is all just an unhappy coincidence; maybe the man with the gun had no political motive (or maybe he was trying to prove himself to Sarah out of love, ala Mark David Chapman).  Maybe this Arizona shooter was just another in a long line of lunatics with guns. God knows that making it easy for lunatics to get their hands on weaponry has a long tradition in this country–similar to the long tradition we have of demagogues who know how to fuel the flame of an unsteady fringe.

But as long as lunatics have ready access to guns, and as long as public figures use the rhetoric of violence to express disagreement, then what, really, can we expect?

Henry II initially insisted that he had no part in Becket’s murder but eventually he walked barefoot into Canterbury, knelt in front of the cathedral, and allowed himself to be flogged by the monks.

Not that I’m recommending a return to public flogging.  I’m just saying that’s what Henry did.

Words have power.  That’s why one of the first things a dictator does, upon wresting control of a country, is to get rid of all those pesky writers who might criticize the government.

For Palin (and Glenn Beck and all the other foaming-mouth fomenters) to assume that her words aren’t fueling a violent fire, if not in Arizona then elsewhere—maybe in your congressional district, maybe in mine—then she’s fooling herself and trying to fool us.

, , , , ,

6 Responses to Will no one rid me of these wretched districts?

  1. Suzie January 9, 2011 at 12:04 am #

    Even if she was not consciously looking to get anyone killed, she is of the simple (black & white) mind that anyone opposed to her views should just be gone. I can’t imagine what it’s like, being so sure all the time. What kind of machinations must one go through to live like that. I’m at a loss.

  2. Halala Mama January 9, 2011 at 7:21 am #

    After 9/11 when any one who didn’t whole heartedly buy into Bush’s actions was painted a traitor and unpatriotic, I said then, ‘this is dangerous.” Palin, Beck, and their lot scare me to death for the same reason – as you said – words have power. If we didn’t believe that, we wouldn’t blog….

  3. Dick Horwich January 9, 2011 at 7:43 pm #

    A great blog, Deborah. Quick (and I mean this), send it to the Times Op-Ed editor.

  4. Suzie January 9, 2011 at 10:50 pm #

    @Dick’s suggestion: yes, do.

  5. Tonya January 11, 2011 at 1:39 pm #

    I think flogging should be brought back. So should Leper colonies.
    This is how it could go:
    “So, Sarah and Glen, thanks for coming today. We have a little surprise for you. Hope you’ve packed a few bags…..No? Well, that’s ok, you probably won’t need them….Where are you going? Well, on a nice little vacation, an island really, kind of like Survivor but better! Don’t worry there will be tv cameras there so you’ll both feel right at home.”

  6. Susan Weisser January 13, 2011 at 5:46 pm #

    I was very much amused by Sarah’s claim journalists who refudiate her inflammatory rhetorical excesses are “inciting hate and violence.” I’ve now read and heard about a thousand comments on her since the Arizona shootings, and oddly, not one implied any violence toward Sarah. But that doesn’t stop her for a second, or I would guess those who treasure her.

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge