Archive | February, 2009

Boxers or Briefs? Caleb goes to the Met…


IMG_0116.JPGCaleb was on vacation from nursery school this week. Liam was on vacation last week. Mommy and Daddy are very much needing a vacation from these vacations…

On Wednesday, I decided that despite my general feelings of ennui (caused, doubtless by the fact that February manages to be both the shortest month on the calendar and the longest month in my psyche), I would take Caleb to the Met. 

Mind you, I didn’t really want to GO to the Met, although mid-morning and mid-week isn’t a bad time to visit, but I’ve been worried, lately, about what the world looks like for Caleb, the second child. With Liam, of course, we were all “oh, let’s take him here, take him there, do this, do that, classes, and lessons, and long excursions…”  By the time Liam was four, he’d been to Paris twice, London once, Vancouver once, and various spots in California. He remembers almost nothing of these adventures, but the point is that they happened. We’ve got the photos to prove it. 

I know, I know, one trip to the Met isn’t going to change Caleb’s life, won’t turn him into a world traveler, but a person has to start somewhere, right? 

Besides, isn’t this why we raise children in the city? So we can introduce our children to these world-class cultural institutions – for the theater, the art, the galleries, the restaurants?  Or at very least, the possibility of these things – because, of course, when you really get down to it, what do I want to do? Pay money for restaurant food that my children won’t eat – or pay for a babysitter so that Husband and I can have a civilized meal together (and try very hard NOT to talk about our children)? And don’t even get me started on the price of tickets to so-called “children’s theater.”

So I decided to give Caleb “an experience,” instead of distracting him with legos and coloring and stickers. We bundled into our coats and zoomed uptown to that alternate universe known as the Upper East Side.

We “skipped to my lou” from the subway to the Met, dodging past the glossy ladies who live and lunch in the 80s, between Park and the park. We moved at Caleb’s pace because it seems like so much of his life is dictated by having to be somewhere on someone else’s schedule – usually his brother’s: pick up your brother, drop off your brother, go to your brother’s swimming class, soccer game, baseball practice…

And when we got to the museum, we hit only the four-year old hot spots: armor, weapons, Egypt.

Our final stop was the Greek and Roman gallery, where I think Caleb was expecting to see Asterix and Obelix, which he and Liam have been watching for the past few nights. Instead, we saw a chariot, and lots of statutes, including a statue of Hercules holding a lionskin.

“Did that guy kill that lion?” Caleb asked. I nodded yes.

“With his penis out like that? … I mean, did he kill that lion wearing no underpants?”

And that’s why we take our kids to the museum. They know what really matters.

Read full story · Comments { 0 } on February 27, 2009 in Children

Everyone Gets a Prize…

trophies.jpgThe other day at breakfast, I started to read part of an article about college students’ grade expectations. According to recent research, forty percent of students polled in a recent survey think that they should get a B just for completing the required reading; two-thirds think that if they tell the professor that they tried really hard on a project, the professor should grade the project more highly. A professor cited in the article said that his students assume the default grade is an “A,” and seem surprised when he tells them that his default grade is a C. I read some of these nuggets out loud to Husband and we chuckled at the research, which bears out what we both see all the time.

This sense of expectation causes students to come into my office insisting that I recalibrate their grades because a B+ just isn’t satisfactory, given how hard they worked on the final paper. Or students who seem surprised that their grade hovers in the realm of a low C because, while they come to class, they slouch in the back half-asleep and never open their mouths. 

Liam, sitting between us at breakfast, wanted to know what we were talking about. Husband waded in: “so let’s say you’re taking a math test with 20 questions,” he said. “You get them all right because you’re good at math but you don’t study at all. Someone else, who studies really, really hard, only gets 10 right. Should that person get the same score as you do?”

Liam smiled, shrugged, said “yeah, sure. I mean, they really tried, right?”

Husband tried again. “Well, okay, what if…someone works really, really hard on their book report, and even thought there are still lots of misspelled words and not much detail, the person put a lot of effort into the project. And someone else writes a great report, with no mistakes and lots of details, but does it without trying very hard, it’s just easy for her. Should they both get a check plus plus?” (Check plus plus is Liam’s teacher’s highest mark. It’s only third grade, after all.)

Once again, Liam nodded and said “uh huh. If the person really really tried, that’s good, isn’t it?”

By this point, I was snorting with laughter and Liam looked a little confused: I think he thought he was giving the right answer, but I knew that Husband was fishing for the “no way, effort smeffort, it’s the end result that counts” answer.

Husband tried a few more times but Liam’s answer remained steadfast: effort mattered as much as, if not more than, the actual finished product.

Having shattered his father’s expectations, Liam hopped down from the table to get ready for school. Husband stared after him.  “Brainwashed already,” he muttered.

Look, I’m not going to say that effort doesn’t count at all. Sure it does. But do you want the surgeon who is operating on your child to be someone who got an A for effort, or do you want the competitive jackass surgeon who aced every single bio and anatomy test?

The shelves in Liam’s room are already littered with “participation” trophies from T-Ball and AYSO, and I’m sure there are more to come. I guess those trophies bolster “self-esteem,” that most ephemeral and oft-quoted raison d’etre for what previous generations might have called “coddling” – but on the other hand, don’t those trophies extend the false promise that everyone is equally good at everything? (Which somehow connects to why people do steroids, but that’s an idea for another post.)

I don’t have an answer to this conundrum; I mean I don’t want to get all Great Santini and tell my kids that they’re crap unless they win, but on the other hand, I don’t want them to think that just showing up is sufficient (which I know flies in the face of what Woody Allen says at the end of “Annie Hall,” but hey: no one in that movie had kids.)

As usual when confronted with a dilemma of this sort, we must turn to the epic of our time, “The Incredibles,” in which the evil SynDrome creates a mechanical super-power so that everyone can be a superhero: “because when everyone is super, no one is super!” At the end of that movie, after SynDrome is defeated, the super-fast Dash races to…second place in the school relay (so as not to make the other kids feel bad) and his family is delighted with his second-place trophy.

Second place, as we tell our kids, can be fine – as long as you tried your best. It’s not winning or losing that matters…it’s the effort that counts, right?

Or is it?

dash.jpg 

Read full story · Comments { 1 } on February 21, 2009 in Education

Growing Pains

Thumbnail image for bubbles.jpg“F. is a liar,” said Liam as we walked to school the other morning. “He said he had all these cool bakugan pieces and he promised he would bring them to recess but he didn’t. He said he couldn’t find them but really he doesn’t have them. I know it. He’s just a big liar.”

I know F. and, in fact, he may be a bit of a liar; he’s also a bit of a bully. But I also know that F. has a pretty miserable family situation and there’s not a lot of extra money around for stupid faux-anime Japanese toys. I think probably F. made up the story about “all the cool bakugan” just so that he could be in the conversation with Liam and his friends at lunchtime recess.

Recess, as we all know, is a pretty fraught place: factions come together and disperse, alliances are formed and dissolved, on a minute-by-minute basis. F gets left out of the bakugan conversation, but Liam gets left out of the Sponge Bob conversation – Sponge Bob doesn’t play at our house yet (yes, it’s true I am the meanest mom that ever lived) – and because of that, apparently, Liam can’t even open his mouth in conversations with the older boys in his karate class. How can I tell him that most of those SpongeBobbing boys are louts (elementary school versions of the boys I used to date in high school, thus causing my parents to hold their heads and keen in despair)?

And yesterday, also at recess, Liam got fed up with another boy, Z., who has apparently been teasing him for months – gave him such a shove that Z. fell down. 

Liars, peer pressure, shoving … my little boy, it seems, has entered the world of Big Kids and I hate it.

Let me say here that I know my son is no angel:  he’s got a Napoleonic streak that sometimes verges on downright tyrannical – I find it infuriating and I can only imagine how he seems to another eight-year-old. In Liam’s world, there are rules and these rules are meant to be followed. I swear that if we sent Liam and a phalanx of other third-graders to the Middle East, peace would be achieved in no time: You! Go over THERE. That’s NOT FAIR. You’re CHEATING. The rules say TIME OUT. TAKE TURNS.

Z. taunts Liam by saying he’s small (and it’s true: my reference to Napoleon was deliberate: Liam is by far the shortest kid in the third grade), and he says Liam is weak and stupid and bad at soccer. And when the teacher isn’t looking, he likes to poke at Liam, squeeze his arm and say he’s got no muscles… Noodgy, nasty stuff (none of which, by the way, other than the “you’re short” accusation, is true. Yes, that is defensiveness you hear in my voice. Sue me).

Liam hadn’t told me about being teased until the day of the shoving. After dinner the other night, he said he needed to talk to me, so we went in my bedroom and he spilled the beans about shoving Z. and knocking him over. He said he didn’t get in trouble because the other kids told the lunch aide that Z. had been yelling at him – and that if Z. hadn’t been making his life miserable, he wouldn’t have been so angry. When I asked him if he’d told anyone what was happening – or if he’d even said anything to Z – he said no. He didn’t want to get Z. in trouble and he didn’t want to be mean. “I thought I could handle it, mommy,” he said, and then folded his little eight-year-old body into a ball and began to cry.

As he cried on my lap, something weirdly ferocious and primal swept through me: an angry she-bear-protecting-her-cub sort of thing. It’s easy to forget about this primordial instinct, I guess, because mostly it’s covered up by logistics and lessons and errands and playdates and bake sales and all the rest of it. But when I saw Liam crumpled up and crying, I wanted to rip that other kids’ head off, or at very least give him a shove myself. 

Thumbnail image for shebear.jpgListening to Liam’s tale of woe and wrestling with my inner she-bear, I started to wonder where he got the message that he had to “handle” things himself. Have we been unreceptive to his worries and tribulations? Or does he think that he’ll be thought “a baby” if he asks for help? Even this morning, when he had a terrible bloody nose, he only told me about it after the fact, telling me that “he knew how to take care of it.”

Taking care of it, however, did not seem to include disposing of the huge stack of wadded-up kleenex, smeared with dried blood, on the floor by his bed: apparently I’m the clean-up crew. (I didn’t do it. I asked him to do it. He complained. I insisted. He eventually complied. Eventually.)  Clearly, he wants to be his own boss and caretaker, but I’m not entirely sure that either of us is ready.

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t want to be a helicopter parent. In my teaching, I see all too clearly what heli-mommy produces: college kids who can’t register for a class, talk to a professor, write a paper, make any decisions, without having a parent run interference. Many of my students seem detached from their own lives because their parents have been calling all the shots, put a kind of protective bubble around their kids. Remember John Travolta as “The Boy in the Plastic Bubble”? That’s the heli-parent effect: same idea, but without the actual plastic or the disease.

Thumbnail image for plasticbubble.jpgHow do Husband and I find that balance between protecting Liam from a world filled with bad behavior, broken promises, and dashed expectations – and letting him make his own choices, find his own way?
 
So much of the language of emerging independence connotes suffering – hard knocks, fight your own battles, take your lumps, pick yourself up and dust yourself off – that it’s no wonder they call it “growing pains.” I guess it would be problematic to send Liam to school covered in bubble wrap – but I’d like to find him some psychic bubble wrap, a kind of padded envelope for his sweet soul, so that he emerges relatively unscathed from the treacherous terrain of childhood.

Can I get that at Staples, do you think?

Read full story · Comments { 3 } on February 16, 2009 in Parenting